FOLLOW ON SOCIAL

Sunday, March 20, 2022

Miscellaneous: "God Our Refuge" - Ben

Uncertainty is like a plague.  It infects our minds and whittles away what confidence we have.  Left to run amuck, this kind of doubt gives way to fear.  And fear can grip the heart so much that we feel as if we cannot breathe.  What are we to do then?  Go to God.  He is our refuge. 

The best place to see God as our refuge is Psalm 91.  Admittedly, Psalm 46 is also an excellent place to go.  However, the critical difference between the two is that Psalm 91 relates specifically to an individual's life rather than a large community.  This can be seen particularly in that Psalm 46 uses words like "our" and "us," whereas Psalm 91 uses personal pronouns such as "I," "my," "me," and "you." Furthermore, where Psalm 46 is filled with expressions of a community's unwavering trust in God, Psalm 91 is filled with declarations of God's promises to an individual.  Both Psalms have validity.  But the point is that God cares as much for the one as He does for the whole.  You may feel left out, overlooked, like no one knows who you are, but God knows you personally.  He loves the one as much as the many. 

Now, to grasp what comes next, you're going to have to go ahead and read Psalm 91.  And really read it.  Please.  What follows isn't worth your time unless you read the passage. 

I’ll wait. 

As you no doubt noticed, the Psalmist portrays God in several ways throughout the Psalm.  For instance, should a hunter set a trap, God will be there to rescue us from their sly hand (vs. 3).  I particularly like how the writer likened the Lord to a mother bird concealing her young from a summer storm (vs. 4a).  But then the Psalmist tells us that God is there on the battlefield with us as a shield, protecting us from our enemies (vs. 4b, 7-8).  This means that we have nothing to fear from the darkest night or the hottest day when God is our refuge (vs. 6). 

But more rewarding than the metaphors is how the Psalmist uses four different names of God right at the beginning of the passage.  And using these names, I'd like to structure the rest of the post. 

God, The Most High.

“Most High” was the name Melchizedek used of God in Gen. 14.  And before some of God's other titles came into vogue with the Israelites, this was the most natural way of speaking about God.  It is also one of the most common methods of talking about God in the book of Psalms.  This title speaks of his incredible power and oversight over all things (cf. Ps. 18:13; 47:2).  Melchizedek knew God as "Creator of heaven and earth"; thus, when we say God is Most High, we speak about his primacy in all things.  He is the first cause.  No one person nor one thing existed before He did. 

He is the pinnacle of all things.  No one is greater than He is.  This is why throughout the Psalms, you'll find expressions where God alone is to be honored, glorified, and praised (cf. Ps. 97:9; 83:8).  He who created the molecules and atoms which make up the universe can also turn them in the direction they should go.  He is the force by which all things continue to exist (cf. Col. 1:17).  The Sun does not burn because of fusion.  The earth does not orbit the Sun because of gravitational forces.  They move through space and time along predestined tracks laid down by a Divine hand. 

God, the Almighty. 

“Almighty” is a fantastic title for God.  Interestingly, in Hebrew, “Almighty” is pronounced Shaddai, and, literally translated, it means to treat violently or to destroy (cf. Ru. 1:20-21).  Yet throughout the OT, Almighty is just as connected with God's promises as his punishments (cf. Gen. 28:3; 35:11; Num. 24:4; Isa. 13:6; Joel 1:15).  And while it only shows up twice in the whole of Psalms, it was the name most on the lips of the likes of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (cf. Gen. 17:1-3).

Being the Almighty speaks of God’s omnipotence.  His is a booming voice reverberating with power (cf. 1 Ki. 19:9-18).  His is a thunderous presence that can evoke fear (cf. Ex. 20:18-21).  It is no wonder that many have said that to speak of God as the "Almighty" is to refer to Him as the great "thunderer” as there are few things that can exude more power than thunder.  Or, as another bible commentator explained, Shaddai could also be understood as God of the “mountains.”

God, The Lord.

The Psalmist then addresses God as “Lord.” In Hebrew, it is actually “Yahweh," and it is the personal name for God.  Unsurprisingly, it appears over 6,500 times in the OT.  And throughout Psalms, "Lord" clocks in at a staggering 787 times.  Interestingly, while Yahweh first appears in Gen. 24:42, we won't know its meaning until Exodus 3:3-15.  There, Moses is communicating with God via a burning bush.  And Moses asks for God's name.  God tells him that is "I AM," or Yahweh.  The simplest way to understand God’s name is to see that God isn’t dependent upon anyone for anything.  God's existence stands on its own.  He is not descended from another; He has always been and will always be. 

God does not abide by any laws or expectations other than His own.  He does as He wants to do.  We ought to never presume to know how He will act but simply know He will act as He wills.  In Psalm 91, the writer uses Yahweh as a form of personal address.  When he talks about Yahweh, he uses "Most High" and "Almighty." But when he talks directly to God, he uses God’s personal name: Yahweh.  The Psalmist’s casual use of God's name speaks of his intimate and close-knit relationship with God. 

God, My God. 

God is not impersonal.  He is not aloof or uncaring.  He is not disconnected from us.  No.  God is our God.  He has a personal, intimate, and unique relationship with us.  Who are we—who am I—to assume ownership of one so great as God?  Yet, that is precisely what the Scriptures tell us to do.  In fact, the phrase "my God" appears nearly a hundred and fifty times in the OT and over fifty times in the Psalms alone!  So, yes, even though He is God, the Most High above all others.  And yes, even though He is God, the Almighty, powerful and without equal.  And yes, even though He is God, Yahweh, the One who holds all things together by the potent force of his name.  That God is also my God. 

From verses one through sixteen, the message of Psalm 91 is clear: God is our protection.  He is the haven unbroken.  He is the fortress unassailable.  He is the refuge unyielding.  We can come to hide under the One who never hides.  God will deliver us out of the schemes of broken men and even the chaos of a broken world.

Monday, March 14, 2022

Miscellaneous: The World of the Wars - Stephen

ANNOUNCER: The Columbia Broadcasting System and its affiliated stations present Orson Welles and the Mercury Theatre on the Air in ‘The War of the Worlds’ by H.G. Wells.[1]

        Those were the opening words to what would eventually become a disastrous masterpiece. On October 30, 1938, thousands turned their radio dials to this broadcast based upon the well-known science fiction novel. Some called the performance that night a feat of artistic excellence. Some critiqued it as a ploy of cultural insensitivity. But no matter what one thought, there is no denying the newspaper headlines the following morning that many believed this “war of the worlds” had genuinely come resulting in mass panic! 

        In our day, we might mock and laugh at such gullibility and ignorance. Our 21st-century progressive minds would have never fallen for such a trick. Yet, the problem with such mocking is that thousands, possibly billions, even now fail to believe the reason for “the world of the wars” instead resulting in mass apathy. Like a cancerous spot ignored, this underlying cause for our earthly wars has been deemed unworthy of our attention. 

Where do wars and fights [come] from among you? Do [they] not [come] from your [desires for] pleasure that war in your members? You lust and do not have. You murder and covet and cannot obtain. You fight and war.

James 4:1-2

        Sin and its nature lying within us all is that cancer. It is disregarded, explained away, and labeled an illness. Insanity is no longer just a plea for the deranged minority in our society but now an excuse for the wickedness of many. Until sin is recognized for what it is the problem of our world will simply be bandaged where amputation is needed. 

        “But,” this world and its leaders say, “what about progress? Look at how far our world has come.” It’s true. Our world has come a long way. For instance, we’ve gone from Neanderthals writing on caves with rocks to artistically writing on the inside of bathroom stalls words of which I don’t want any of my kids to ever repeat. Ok, bad example. Or is it?

        In all seriousness, progress has been made. Just look at our phones from what they were when attached to the walls of our homes to what they are now. And, yet, with such “progress,” war remains…to the shock of many.

        In response to the recent Ukraine-Russia conflict former Secretary of State John Kerry remarked in disbelief: “I thought we lived in a world that had said no to that kind of activity. And I hope diplomacy will win.”[2] Author Trevin Wax dealt with this topic in a recent article entitled, “Putin, the West, and the Myth of Progress.” In it, he suggests:

Why do so many leaders speak as though they could simply will a better future into existence, as if the calendar itself might help push against “medieval” mindsets and ensure our journey toward more sophisticated and civilized heights? Because of the Enlightenment’s unshakable faith in progress. [3]

        This “faith in progress” is what keeps us from the truth about our world and its wars. To call the source of these conflicts anything other than sin is to ignore the ongoing problem for what it is. We must ask ourselves, “Why is sin so hard for our world leaders to admit as the cause?” Because to do so they would have to admit two very personal and humbling things.

        First, they would have to acknowledge that the answer lies outside of their own power. It does not simply find itself in stronger leadership, higher education, or more sophisticated technology; it ultimately lies within the Gospel of Jesus Christ.[4] An answer of which they have very little part. Secondly, to admit this true cause for our world of war, they must confess they not only fail to be the answer but are actually infected with the problem. Sin is truly the common denominator within us all.[5]

        But before we ever point a finger at our leaders to profess these two essential truths, may we first look in the mirror. Have we admitted these things? Or have we begun to believe the answer to our world’s problems, or maybe just the ones within our everyday lives, are found in something we can do or achieve ourselves? If the latter is answered in the affirmative that answer will never be found sufficient. This is not to negate the role of human responsibility but merely put it in its proper place. 

        Do we also continually admit that sin lies within our own hearts? We’re sinful whether we acknowledge it or not. The only difference between the two is finding the freedom that comes with honesty.[6]

        God, through the power of the Gospel, can change any heart within our World of War. That is everyone except those unwilling to confess their need for Him. May we not be one of those people. People like the religious leaders of Christ’s day who questioned why Jesus would be willing to even sit and eat with people who knew themselves to be “sinners.” Here’s His response to those with such a self-professed “righteous” heart:

When Jesus heard [that], He said to them, "Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. "But go and learn what [this] means: 'I desire mercy and not sacrifice.' For I did not come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance."

Matthew 9:12-13

        War is sad, grieving, and gut-wrenching, but should never be shocking. As long as this cause for it exists, the result will always be the same. We might never find ourselves believing that aliens are attacking a small town in New Jersey causing the War of the Worlds, but the consequence of ignoring the cause and reason for the World of the Wars is greater. May we not find ourselves on the wrong side of this truth and be willing to warn those who do. For the closing words of this eternal story won’t end like the one in 1938.


Orson Welles: This is Orson Welles, ladies and gentlemen, out of character to assure you that The War of The Worlds has no further significance than as the holiday offering it was intended to be.[7] 

Monday, March 7, 2022

The 10 Commandments for the Modern World | The Second Commandment - Ron

“What’s the second commandment?” That was the question I asked my family as we drove home the other day. 

Once one of my kids started with, “Honor thy father and…” all of them chimed in to finish. I am failing at life, I thought to myself. And while I am overjoyed that my children know that it is biblical to honor me and my wife, I’d rather them know the correct answer in this instance.

After some momentary fumbling, I heard, “Have no other gods before Me,” ring out from the back of the vehicle. Strike two for son three. But then, like a melody from on high came this ringing sound, “Don’t make idols!” Son two for the win. And most everyone would agree. But I think they would be wrong. Or at least halfway to it.

In the twentieth chapter of the book of Exodus, God gives to Moses the Decalogue. These ten commands formed the basis of God’s expectations for the nation of Israel. The task assigned to me has been to take the second commandment (verses 4-6) and apply it to our modern world in a practical way. My task is complicated from a technical standpoint because the second commandment appears to receive considerable overlap from the first. As a result, this post may be a different style of writing than you are used to reading on our blog. I mean that to whet your curiosity and not as a warning.

Ben brought the first commandment into our living rooms, as it were, when he dealt with the beautifully simple but staggeringly all-inclusive “thou shalt have no other Gods before me.” Dennis Prager says this first commandment “is not only relevant to modern life; it is in many ways the mother of all the other commandments. Today we have as many false gods as the ancients did” (Prager, 2018, p. 228).

Because the first two commandments are so closely related, my goal today is to separate them while showing that the second is as applicable to us today as is the first. Truly, no one would doubt the applicability of the first commandment – if you do, go back and read Ben’s post – but the verdict may be out on the second. The post can be broken into two sections with the first explaining the commandment and the second applying it to our modern times.

Explanation

The second commandment forbids three actions represented by verbs. Thou shalt not make, thou shalt not bow, and thou shalt not serve. We typically only know and remember the first, but as we will see, that narrow understanding will create some issues. Consequently, the first question that needs to be addressed is: are the three to be taken as one? To wit, is it okay to make as long as one does not bow and serve? My proposition is that the bowing and serving are the main prohibitions in this commandment, but that all three should be taken together.

It would have been difficult for the Israelites to prostitute themselves before the golden calf had Aaron not made one, but the making of a golden calf did not cause them to worship it. Furthermore, God specifically told the Israelites to make both cherubim to adorn the Ark of the Covenant (Exodus 25:18-21) and a bronze serpent to raise in the wilderness (Numbers 21:8-9). Obviously, these are not examples of God breaking His own commandment, even if they are graven (created, fashioned) images.

We could take this first question even further and go into the realm of motivation. But, in so doing, I could write all day and I do not have the time for that. Suffice it to say, even the making of a statue could be wrong dependent upon the motivation, whether it was worshipped or not. This internal barometer is the sum of much of the teachings of Christ. For now, we will focus on making with the intention of bowing and serving.

Here is a noticeable differentiation between the first and second commandment. In the first commandment, we are not to have and in the second we are not to make. Granted, the second two of our three verbs apply to both, even if in an implied way for the first commandment. The question becomes: doesn’t the first commandment imply the second? In short, the answer is no.

The first commandment deals with elevating something that is else into the position that God alone holds. The second commandment deals with bringing God down into a form we can handle and understand. Of the second commandment, Dennis Prager writes, “the primary purpose of this commandment is to prohibit images intended to be representations of God” (Prager, 2018, p. 238). We know this is the case because the command doesn’t stop at making the image, it continues on into the bowing and serving.

In order to fully understand this commandment, we must understand what it meant for the Israelites. Adam Clarke sums it up: “this commandment includes in its prohibitions every species of idolatry known to have been practiced among the Egyptians” (Clarke, 1825). Clarke dives into specifics, and even connects the plagues of Egypt, but those discussions lie outside the scope of this post. In short, the Israelites knew what it was like to worship an image in the place of a god. They had seen it. And they were forbidden from doing it.

Who can forget the dramatic scene of Yul Brynner as Pharaoh placing his deceased son on the outstretched arms of the black statue of Sokar in the movie, The Ten Commandments?  He says, “Sokar, great lord of the lower world, I, who have denied the gods of Egypt, bow before you now.” We know that the statue is not the god because Pharaoh’s request includes guiding the soul of the deceased boy back into the world of the living. The statue wasn’t about to move, but it represented a god that could. And this scene perfectly describes what is specifically forbidden by the second commandment.

So, the second commandment could be explained as not serving and bowing before a representation of God, regardless of what it looks like. This is especially important because God is not made of human hands, or of anything physical at all (Deuteronomy 4:15). There is always “a danger that if God is depicted visually, people will confuse the depiction with God” (Prager, 2018, p. 238). We are not to have a manmade image of God (or a god) in our mind that will mess up or interfere with our worship.

Why?

Application

The New Testament consistently uses the phrase made with hands. In Acts 7, it is said that the Israelites “rejoiced in the works of their own hands” when worshipping the calf (v. 41). A few verses later, we are told that “the most High dwelleth not in temples made with hands…” (Acts 7:48). We are reminded of the same in Acts 17, and in Acts 19 Paul turned many people to the truth by saying “they be no gods, which are made with hands” (v. 26). In the book of Hebrews, we are told that Christ is a high priest in a tabernacle “not made with hands” and he did not enter “into the holy places made with hands” (Hebrews 9:11, 24).

Romans chapter one gives us a glimpse into the modern danger when Paul writes that fools have “changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things” (v. 23). This is the breaking of the second commandment. It “changes the truth of God into a lie” and causes us to worship and serve the “creature more than the Creator” (Romans 1:24-25).

How can we make the truth of God into a lie by creating a physical representation to worship through? I cannot help but go toward the religious iconography of Catholicism and other denominations, but that seems like low-hanging fruit. Besides I do not want to waste an opportunity to think through something that I feel deeply about. My prayer is that it causes you to think as well, even if we disagree at the end.

For the next few moments, I am going to attempt to bring this commandment into our modern world in a practical way by using The Chosen television series. My proposition is that this show, and others like it, actually violate the second commandment. How far one takes this - passion plays, nativity scenes -is beyond my purview.

In an effort at full disclosure, I have seen the show. I watched the first two episodes. I felt feelings, and I get the draw. And that is exactly my issue. In one scene, Jesus is at a camp in the wilderness alone, and two children come upon the campsite. I watched the interaction between Jesus and the children and was all kinds of emotional in watching it. But that isn’t Jesus and every single thing that actor did turns the truth of God, at least a little bit, into a lie. The fact of the matter is “The Chosen depicts a Jesus that is not the Jesus of the Scriptures. Based on other social media comments, it is clear that…viewers have created a Jesus that’s a figment of their own imagination” (Rhetts, 2021).

I understand fully that I am on the lonely side of this argument. In fact, I do not personally know anyone who agrees with me (correction: my wife proofread this and said she agrees). But check out the Facebook comment provided by a Bonny Simmons – and realize that this is what I have heard most from people about the show. Bonny writes, “This series is amazing. It shows Jesus as I never imagined Him” (Rhetts, 2021). Of course it does, Bonny, because God revealed the life of Christ to you through the written Word, and the show translates it into something else.

What can be known about Christ has been made known through the completed revelation of God. And if cascades of people coming to know Jesus as He is portrayed on a TV show instead of how He is in Scripture doesn’t bother you, check out the included Facebook post from show’s creators. It allows you to choose your mood based upon faces that Jesus is making in the show.

But that isn’t Jesus. Not even close. In a blog post, a blogger named Brian writes, “If you try to image God, you’ll totally ruin your ability to know him. You’ll settle for less than God, and put some thing in between you and God, and block yourself off from knowing him at all” (Brian, 2020). I agree, Brian, well done.

Brian wrestled with some of the same thoughts I did while watching the show. He asked questions such as: “Is it ‘making an image of God,’ to enjoy seeing Jesus portrayed like this” (Brian, 2020)? Eventually, Brain concludes that “It could be wrong…I could make that my image of Jesus when I pray to him. I could find the Bible boring and the show exciting. I could need the show to feel close to God. And that would be idolatry” (Brian, 2020, emphasis in the original). Again, I find myself in agreement with Brian.

And still Brian and I reach different conclusions.

Brian uses the incarnation of the Son of God as a proof for why The Chosen, in general, is okay. God has already provided to us a human image of Himself. In that, Brian is not wrong. The Scripture he quotes is sound. John 1:14 does say “And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.” Hebrews 1:3 does say that Christ is “the brightness of his [God’s] glory, and the express image of his [God’s] person….”

This leads Brian to conclude, “In Jesus, we saw what Moses didn’t see—we saw God’s glory, visible, in a face. A human face” (Brian, 2020). I find myself agreeing with Brian, even here, and yet this confirms even more so my belief that The Chosen, and even movies like The Passion of the Christ violate the second commandment.

I didn’t see Jesus while He walked this earth. And neither did you. And neither did Brian. And if God had wanted sketches of His Son to remain to us, He could have preserved them as a part of Scripture. When I watch The Chosen, I am not seeing the express brightness of God’s glory. I am seeing an actor trying to represent what Christ might have done. I am seeing a director attempting to recreate facial expressions and body language that the Son of God might have had. And I am seeing a television show that attempts to fill-in between the lines of Scripture.

Regarding the second commandment, I think the great threat we face in our modern world is becoming so comfortable with a representation of God, or Christ, that we fail to see Him the way He intended us to. He has revealed Himself to us through His Word. If we have an image of Him that we slowly begin to worship and serve, the reality gets lost. Don’t let a representation of God rob you from the Scriptures.

In 1959, the movie Ben-Hur showed a representation of Christ. Out of reverence, the actor playing Jesus was only seen from the back, or had his face blurred. In fact, the actor wasn’t even credited in the movie. Today, you can choose your mood based on Jesus’ facial expressions.

You may disagree with me completely. My hope was that you would think and engage. But I cannot help but feel that The Chosen turns the truth of God into a lie, even if it is a little one. And that is enough for me.

References:

Clarke, A. (1825). Exodus 20 - Clarke’s commentary - Bible commentaries. StudyLight.Org. https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/eng/acc/exodus-20.html

Brian. (2020). Idolatry, the chosen, and the face of God. PHILLY YOUNG ADULTS | Ccphilly.Org. http://youngadults.ccphilly.org/idolatry-the-chosen-and-the-face-of-god/

Prager, D. (2018). The rational Bible: Exodus. Regnery Faith.

Rhetts, B. (2021). A preliminary analysis of the “Christian” TV series ‘The Chosen.’ The Expositor. https://www.theexpositor.tv/blog/a-preliminary-analysis-of-the-christian-tv-series-the-chosen/