FOLLOW ON SOCIAL

Sunday, September 18, 2022

Miscellaneous: "A Desert Bush And A Jar of Clay" – Ben

Exodus 3:1-6 (ESV)

Now Moses was keeping the flock of his father-in-law, Jethro, the priest of Midian, and he led his flock to the west side of the wilderness and came to Horeb, the mountain of God. And the angel of the Lord appeared to him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush. He looked, and behold, the bush was burning, yet it was not consumed.  And Moses said, "I will turn aside to see this great sight, why the bush is not burned." When the Lord saw that he turned aside to see, God called to him out of the bush, "Moses, Moses!" And he said, "Here I am." Then he said, "Do not come near; take your sandals off your feet, for the place on which you are standing is holy ground." And he said, "I am the God of your father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob." And Moses hid his face, for he was afraid to look at God."

Have you ever wondered, "Why did the Lord appear to Moses in a burning bush?" We're not told explicitly. So, technically, the most defensible answer to that question is that we do not know why. However, that's also the most boring answer, and, to be frank, it's a copout. It's a bush that speaks and is on fire without being burned up, for crying out loud! Don't you think we should at least try to understand why God would do something so unusual? What's more, I believe God's reasoning behind why he appeared to Moses in that way is revealed in the course of events. And, as I will try to show in what follows, I believe the purpose of the burning bush was for it to be a living illustration that helped Moses understand God's plan for his life.  

Here's what I mean. 

Moses was an inauspicious man (cf. Ex. 3:11) with no message of his own (cf. Ex. 3:13) who was not only untrustworthy due to his past (cf. Ex. 4:1), but he could not speak without some kind of aide (cf. Ex. 4:10), and he was perfectly content to remain right where he had been for forty years (cf. Ex. 4:13). Yet, despite all of his faults, God chose an aging shepherd to lead an entire nation out of bondage. 

God's appearance to Moses in a burning bush illustrated man's powerlessness and the Lord's powerfulness. You see, the marvel of that moment wasn't the plant (obviously) but the fact that, unlike every other fire that had ever been lit, that particular flame which had engulfed that particular bush chose not to consume it (cf. Ex. 3:2). Instead, God's blazing presence made a backcountry weed into a first-rate marvel that had to be seen (cf. Ex. 3:3). Likewise, God would take Moses—i.e., a lowly desert shrub—and allow his power to rest upon him. And just as the fire did not consume the bush, God's power would not destroy Moses; instead, it would transform him into such a marvel that every person in Egypt would fix their eyes on him. They will watch as this shepherd-turned-prophet performs many wonderous works in their presence (cf. Ex. 3:20). Ultimately, the Egyptians would end up bearing witness as this fiery tumbleweed from Midian floors a towering oak nourished by the Nile, bringing a mighty nation crashing to its knees. 

And that is the way of things. God takes the so-called "simple things" of this life and uses them—i.e., us—to perplex and confound the wise (cf. 1 Cor. 1:27). Moses learned that the way that God works is by calling and equipping people that no one in the right mind would ever choose. In fact, Moses wasn't the only one who learned this principle. The apostle Paul had to learn this lesson as well. 

When Paul was confronted with his own shortcomings, he implored the Lord three times that his "thorn in the flesh" be removed (cf. 2 Corinthians 12:8). And how did Jesus respond? "My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness." Or another way of reading that is, "Paul, no. I will not remove that thorn because I am already strong enough for you. That thorn will ensure you will rely upon me all the more."  But rather than bemoan his fate, Paul explains, "I will boast all the more gladly of my weaknesses so that the power of Christ may rest upon me. For the sake of Christ, then, I am content with weaknesses, insults, hardships, persecutions, and calamities. For when I am weak, then I am strong." Do not miss the apostle's point: Paul gladly admitted that he was strongest when he was weakest. He had learned that the less reliant he became on his own abilities, the more reliant he became upon God's abilities. Thus, paradoxically, a Paul with the thorn was better off than a Paul without the thorn.

For Moses, he was nothing but a desert bush. For Paul, by his own admission, he was nothing but a jar of clay (cf. 2 Cor. 4:7). Yet, despite their unremarkable natures, both men were used mightily by God. Moses was lit on fire, and all the world saw the light. Paul was a vessel for the treasures and mysteries of God, and all the world was turned upside down (cf. Ac. 17:6).  For us, well, what are we? Without God, we are nothing. But, oh, what wonderful things we can do with God. Thus, dear Christian, what makes us special is not who we are but who we are with the power of God that rests upon our shoulders and the promises that dwell within our hearts. Our world needs more people like Moses, who burn for the Lord. And our planet needs believers like Paul, who proclaim the truths of the Scriptures. 

Sunday, September 11, 2022

Miscellaneous: "The Battles of Our World Defined" - Stephen

“Words have meaning.” 

That was the opening phrase of my professor in Bible college every day he would walk in, straighten his stool, and take a seat for class. Sounds so elementary, doesn’t it? Of course, words have meaning. But do we always realize what this statement fully entails? If our modern society (and my professor’s incessant reminder) is any indication, the answer to that would have to be “no.” 

 

In the battles of our world today, it seems everyone is using the same terms and fighting for the same things at least in word. So why are we still fighting? Why is there a seemingly ceaseless confrontation with posters on both sides using similar though sometimes rearranged phrases? Because the battles of our world center around redefined causes. Simply put, the words of others are being defined differently than the same words you or I use.  

 

With the overturning of Roe v. Wade by the Supreme Court, we get our first example of this. One side says they are pro-choice because no one should tell someone what they should do with their body (i.e., women). The other side says they are pro-life because they also believe no one should tell someone else what they should do with one’s body (i.e., baby). Same terms, same phrases, but different meanings and application.

 

Before we believe this is an isolated event, I give you another example. One side says they are for Black Lives Matter because they desire equal rights for all people of every race. The other side says they are against the Black Lives Matter movement because they desire equal rights for all people of every race. Same goal, different tactic yet still using similar words. 

 

Let’s keep sifting through our recent headlines to find one more example. Love from one perspective is like a professional baseball player was quoted a few months ago when asked about Gay Pride Month: “Love everyone as they are, go live your life, whatever your preferences are, go be you." Therefore, “love,” with this definition, seems to be a willingness to accept people’s actions despite its kind, consequences, or destructive nature as long as it brings that person happiness. 

 

Ironically enough, a fellow player on that same MLB team responded with a different definition of love when he said:


“It's just a lifestyle that maybe…we don't want to encourage…if we believe in Jesus, who's encouraged us to live a lifestyle that would abstain from that behavior. It's not judgmental. It's not looking down. It's just what we believe the lifestyle he's encouraged us to live, for our good, not to withhold. But again, we love these men and women, we care about them…."

 

One side says they are for same-sex relationships because they love those who are involved in such a lifestyle. The other side says they are against same-sex relationships in-part because they love those who are involved in such a lifestyle. As you can see, love, and its defining, is one of the most conflicting words in our culture today. 

 

“Love” as the Bible defines it is a willingness to be honest with others when they are not “abhorring” evil and “clinging” to what is good (cf. Romans 12:9). It’s the exact kind of love Proverbs 27:6 describes when it says, “Faithful are the wounds of a friend, But the kisses of an enemy are deceitful.” And it’s the exact kind of love that Jesus showed the Rich Young Ruler in Mark 10:21-22, when the Bible says: 


“Then Jesus, looking at him, loved him, and said to him, ‘One thing you lack: Go your way, sell whatever you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, take up the cross, and follow Me.’  But he was sad at this word, and went away sorrowful, for he had great possessions.”

 

Jesus wasn’t redefining anything here, He was simply restoring love to its original meaning. This type of love is characterized by a willingness to sacrifice personal comfort and acceptance for the potential eternal good of someone else. But, once again, this is not how everyone defines the word. 

 

In response to an article announcing the return of a Chick-Fil-A restaurant within the Cincinnati Airport, notice these real-time responses on social media alluding to the company’s CEO and his support for traditional marriage (i.e., definition of love):


-       “Life is too short to eat soggy, undercooked and flavorless hate chicken.”

-       “Popeyes is better and they don’t hate anyone.”

-       “Your flight with a side of hate!”

 

In a generation where reading is seen by many as archaic and boring, who would have ever thought that words would be so important and the cause for so much confrontation? It can no longer simply be said that “Words have meaning.” They do, but the greater question is, “Whose meaning?” Many of our battles today are not simply a differing of opinions but a battle over the dictionary. 

 

The words both sides are using are contained within them. The real difference is who we’re allowing to write the definitions: ever-changing society whose hearts are dictated by feelings or a never changing Someone who claims to have created the hearts themselves (cf. Genesis 1)? 

 

Your answer not only aligns you many times with a side of the battles, but also who you’re allowing to lead you into their strategies and outcomes.

May we choose wisely. 

For only one side, no matter how you define it, can ultimately be right. 

 

“Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness; Who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!”

[Isaiah 5:20]

 

____________________________________________
References Used: 

[1] https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/06/sport/tampa-bay-lgbtq-pride-mlb-spt-intl/index.html

[2] https://local12.com/news/local/cvg-chickfila-reopen-cincinnati-northern-kentucky-international-airport-concourse-b-food-court-hms-host-chicken-sandwich-chain?fbclid=IwAR3Q27UDFJGLbhGqN2mujMOpV-RRz8ANJMZm6obrZg2GRUVXUYvoura0BAo

[3] Local 12, WKRC-TV, “CVG’s Chick-Fil-A to Reopen…”, 18 July 2022 at 4:31 PM, comments on Facebook. 

Monday, September 5, 2022

The 10 Commandments for the Modern World | The Eighth: Don't Steal - Ron

I am familiar with the eighth commandment. So are you. If there are two commandments that everyone knows, murdering and stealing are it. This is probably because kids begin stealing at such an early age. Just watch two kids toddling around together among some toys and tell me how long it is before one steals a toy from the other. So, children learn - at least in that context - that taking property from others is wrong.

“Thou shalt not steal” (Exodus 20:15).

This commandment seems simple, but don’t sleep on it. 

Dennis Prager (2018) says, “the eighth commandment…is unique in that it encompasses all the other commandments on the second tablet…” (p. 264). He also writes that “if everyone observed only one of the Ten Commandments, observing the commandment “Do Not Steal” – with all of its manifold implications – would, by itself, make an ethically decent world” (Prager, 2018, p. 267).

To me, that seemed like too huge a statement to make. But the more I thought about it, the more the statement grew on me. The comments for this verse in The Preacher’s Complete Homiletical Bible Commentary (PCHBC) helped to solidify my mind further. The commentary for Exodus 20:15 is broken into three sections: we must not rob ourselves, we must not rob our neighbors, and we must not rob God.

Try and think of what the world would be like if every single person achieved perfection in those three areas. Just one sneakily complex commandment. Don’t steal. Let’s examine these three areas for just a few moments.

DO NOT ROB YOURSELF

We can rob ourselves in a myriad of ways, but two examples can suffice. 

First, “the prodigal robbed himself by sinful spending and was reduced to starvation” (PCHBC). Many Americans are in debt beyond their ability to pay. This was true before the recent spike in inflation, so let’s not jump straight to that song and dance routine. Even though it is a depressingly good excuse. The bald truth of it is that we spend more than we should and more frivolously than we should. Crippling debt leaves families struggling mentally, emotionally, and financially. Insofar as we are to blame, we have robbed ourselves of our peace and health, at the very least.

Second, we also rob ourselves by “misusing our privileges…abusing Divine gifts…[and] by letting pride and prejudice prevent us receiving gospel blessings” (PCHBC). Nowadays we use phrases like, “he really wasted his potential,” or, “what a waste of talent,” to say the same thing. We rob ourselves when we do not use our talents. We may be robbing ourselves of ways to be used for God’s glory. We may be robbing ourselves of development or promotional opportunities. Did you ever think that your actions might be robbing you of the very goal you are trying to reach?

DO NOT ROB YOUR NEIGHBOR

This is the most obvious interpretation and application of the eighth commandment. But did you ever stop to think that this commandment forbids kidnapping and slavery?

In his commentary, Adam Clarke (1826) writes, “all kidnapping, crimping, and slave-dealing are prohibited here, whether practiced by individuals or by the state.” Dennis Prager agrees. He writes, “critics of the Bible who argue the Bible allowed such slavery, and defenders of such slavery who used the Bible, were both wrong” (Prager, 2018, p. 265). Our enlightened society has moved beyond slavery, of course. Society has not moved beyond pornography, however, and it creates more worldwide child and human kidnapping and trafficking than anything else. 

“That’s right. Porn and sex trafficking are inseparably linked, and much of society denies or is unaware of this fact” (By the Numbers: Is the Porn Industry Connected to Sex Trafficking?, 2022). The article goes on to quote the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) which defines sex trafficking as a “modern-day form of slavery” (TVPA, 2000). Just because porn has become a national pastime does not make it acceptable. 

The eighth commandment also speaks to the Marxist view towards the abolishing of private property. The commandment regarding stealing presumes the existence of private property. One cannot steal that which no one owns. As our government steeps itself further into the trenches of socialism, remember the words of the Communist Manifesto: “this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property” (Marx et al., 1848).

We can finish up this section with another quote from Adam Clarke. This will serve as a good reminder for those of us who live in societies trending ever-away from godliness, “crimes are not lessened in their demerit by the number, or political importance of those who commit them. A state that enacts bad laws is as criminal before God as the individual who breaks good ones” (Clarke, 1826).

DO NOT ROB GOD

This one is admittedly a doozy. The Bible says that you were created for Him and His pleasure (Isaiah 43:7; Colossians 1:16). Simply put, we rob God the instant we fail to bring Him the glory due Him. That, my friend, ends up being quite the rap sheet.

We rob God of thanksgiving and praise on the regular. We often squander His blessings and fail to recognize His work in our lives. Malachi says it is possible to rob God in our finances (Malachi 3:8). This post has already been long, so I don’t want to belabor the point. Suffice it to say, I sure am thankful for Jesus and the fact that I wear His righteousness opposed to my own. 

Christians can still rob God, though, and we ought to quit. 

Are you a thief? Probably so, in some way. This simple commandment is a lot more complex than it may appear. Maybe today is a good day to ask the Spirit to bring your thieving ways to your knowledge and begin a program of growth in your life.

Since this is posting on Labor Day, let me remind everyone of what Jesus said in Luke 10:7, "the laborer is worthy of his hire...". Don't rob from people who work with and for you!

References:

By the numbers: Is the porn industry connected to sex trafficking? (2022). Fight the New Drug. 

    https://fightthenewdrug.org/by-the-numbers-porn-sex-trafficking-connected/

Clarke, Adam (1826). Adam Clarke's Commentary on the Bible. Public Domain.

Marx, K., Engels, F. (1848). The communist manifesto. Independently published.

Prager, D. (2018). The rational Bible: Exodus. Regnery Faith.

The Preacher’s Complete Homiletical Bible Commentary (PCHBC). (1892). Public Domain.

Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106–386, Section 102(a), 114 Stat. 

    1464. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-106hr3244enr/pdf/BILLS-106hr3244enr.pd